Style: At the end of part 4, Andy Mulligan uses newspaper stories to reveal further information about Senator Zapanta and the mystery. What information is revealed? Do all of the papers share the same view? How is this an effective way to reveal the story?

Coming to the end of part 4, the writer Andy Mulligan shows newspaper articles to shed some more light on Senator Zapanta and the mystery of the crime they have been trying to solve. I think these articles have a similar point of looking at this controversy but the perspectives are just a tiny bit different. This is an effective way of revealing information because it gives information on what the public would react to what is going on in the book. This technique also summarises what the whole mystery has been about without having to be trapped in all that suspense.